[MD] two good questions...

[MarshaV]

Mark,

I have found contentment with my own ignorance which has led to a deep, endless respect for the question over and above any possible answer.  Mor me, it is the question that contains intuition and caring.


Marsha



On Oct 22, 2012, at 3:42 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> Mark,
> At the moment, the continuous present is valuable.
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 21, 2012, at 2:23 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Marsha,
>> Could you rephrase the question?  I have no idea what you are asking.
>> Understanding lasts all our life.  It is that SQ which we create.  Is this
>> what you are asking?
>> 
>> What is what?  Please describe your question.
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>> 
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:21 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mark,
>>> 
>>> You say a value (understanding) lasts how long?  So what is it?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:56 PM, 118 wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Marsha,
>>>> I am not sure how to answer your question.  Could you phrase it in a
>>>> different way?  I am not quite sure what you are asking.  What is it that
>>>> you are trying to find out?  You had said that everything you post is a
>>>> question.  I am confused.
>>>> 
>>>> Of course the reality we put into words is part of reality.  Is that what
>>>> you are asking?  I suppose I am confused by your use of the term reality.
>>>> Reality is what is.  A presentation of reality is reality as it happens.
>>>> 
>>>> Like I said, I have a problem understanding what you are seeking with
>>> your
>>>> questions.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:07 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark,
>>>>> 
>>>>> “The reality we can put into words is never reality itself.”
>>>>>    (Werner Heisenberg)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I agree with Werner Heisenberg that the reality we can put into words is
>>>>> never reality itself, and I did state to Jan-Anders, long ago, that the
>>>>> problem I see both question #1 & #2 addressing concerns the nature of
>>>>> reality.  As I said, the questions were already answered.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marsha
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:10 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess it is said that there is no such thing as a stupid question?
>>>>> Sometimes I wonder?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mark?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:19 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mark,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So simple...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation,
>>>>>>> but as a question."
>>>>>>> (Niels Bohr)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Marsha:
>>>>>>> I agree with Niels Bohr that every sentence I utter must be understood
>>>>>>> not as an affirmation, but as a question, or as hypothetical.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html