[MD] Words and Metaphysical Mysticism.
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Fri Sep 7 14:28:05 PDT 2012
Hi David and All,
Bare bones metaphysics! Evolution, order, conception are still on the
table. For myself I like a theory of knowledge based on the acceptance of
emotions as DQ. Emotions are indefinable like DQ.
Ladies seem to be closer to their emotions than men. IMHO the metaphysics
of indefinable emotions come closest to DQ reality. They are validated in
their expression. Emotions are indefinable.
I envision no mathematics of emotions! Metaphysics of emotions are on the
table as the source, the DQ basket.
Joe
On 9/5/12 6:30 PM, "David Harding" <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:
> You were giving yourself a way out.. You don't seem interested in ideas. You
> just want to continually say - the fundamental nature of static quality is
> dynamic quality. End of story.. what's to talk about? I want to talk about
> the static patterns of the MOQ as this is what is valuable to do -
> intellectually. Interesting to see if you change your tune...
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list