[MD] Words and Metaphysical Mysticism.

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:50 AM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>> Dan:
>> Ah! So it is possible to totally isolate the individual, the
>> apparatus, and the observers of said experiment in a way that the
>> outcome could be seen as concretely determined?
>>
>> But that is beside the point. What the researchers would see is parts
>> of the brain lighting up. That would tell them nothing about trees.
>>
>> Dan:
>> I think you've been talking to too many scientists.
>
> Concrete?

Dan:

Well, this is what you said:

"... with enough observation, and the right type of experiment which
removes all distractions it would be safe to make a conclusion about
which parts of the brain lighting up relate to a particular
thought.."

Sounds pretty 'safe' to say the conclusion is set in concrete, no?

David H;
> Too many scientists?

Dan:
I'd say one too many, yes. :)

>
> Science is good no?

Dan:
Did I say that? No, looking back over my post I did not. It is only
when those who claim to be that which they obviously are not that
"scientists" are no good. Science is wonderful.

Dan

http://www.danglover.com