[MD] DQ/sq as WATER/ice

[MarshaV]

Joe,

DQ
is 
indeterminate.  
IMHO.

Marsha



On Apr 1, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> The discussion embraces the path to knowledge without the analysis of the
> theory of knowledge.  The logic of mathematics, defined experience, cannot
> logically validate indefinable emotions DQ/SQ.
> 
> The SOM metaphysical suggestion of abstraction as the value of knowledge is
> indefensible.  Knowledge is direct experience.
> 
> How does a theory of knowledge incorporate direct experience in definition?
> Pirsig suggests that a sentient being perceives DQ/SQ.  DQ is indefinable
> direct experience.  SQ is definable direct experience.
> 
> The metaphysical description is DQ/SQ.  The structure for experience is
> DQ/SQ.  What separates DQ/SQ as the description of reality?  DQ is
> indefinable, SQ is definable.
> 
> Understanding MOQ, the metaphysics of describing indefinable/definable
> reality, can be somewhat vague.
> 
> DQ, indefinable, is not necessarily coupled to definable SQ in evolution!
> It can stand alone, indefinable reality.   DQ/SQ tweaks the theory of
> knowledge to a more complex metaphysical definable/indefinable structure in
> direct experience.
> 
> IMHO Joe  
> 
> 
> On 4/1/13 1:04 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Joe,
>> 
>> Directly experiencing DQ is directly realizing that there is nothing (nothing
>> divisible, definable and knowable) persisting from moment to moment.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> snip...   
>>>