[MD] self

[MarshaV]

X-man,

In such a way a unicorn exists too.  


Marsha


On Feb 3, 2013, at 3:09 AM, X <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:

> The tetralemma can be addressed in this way
> We ask if the concept has meaning if it has value.
> If it has value we can say it exists.
> 
> 
> MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:21 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>> 
>> But, X-man and dmb,
>> 
>> the definition in the previous post (below) represents a static interpretation, Ultimately:
>> 
>> One cannot say that the self exists. 
>> One cannot say that the self does not exist. 
>> One cannot say that self both exists and does not exist. 
>> One cannot say that the self neither exists nor does not exist.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------- 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:56 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings X-man and dmb,
>> 
>> Here's my definition of the self:  the “self” is a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.   
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html