[MD] self

[X]

The tetralemma can be addressed in this way
We ask if the concept has meaning if it has value.
If it has value we can say it exists.


MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

>
> 
>
>On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:21 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>
>But, X-man and dmb,
>
>the definition in the previous post (below) represents a static interpretation, Ultimately:
>
>One cannot say that the self exists. 
>One cannot say that the self does not exist. 
>One cannot say that self both exists and does not exist. 
>One cannot say that the self neither exists nor does not exist.
>
>
>
>Marsha 
>
>
>------------- 
>
>
>On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:56 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>Greetings X-man and dmb,
>
>Here's my definition of the self:  the “self” is a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.   
>
>
>Marsha
>
>
> 
>___
> 
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org/md/archives.html