[MD] Putting SOM back into the MOQ by excluding SQ, let's not do that say some of us

[david buchanan]

D. Morey said: 
...DMB and Dan seem to think DQ is a flux with content, odd use of the word flux. Up to you really do you prefer pre-conceptual SQ, pretty sensible notion, or flux with content? -bit odd.  ...Hope that clarifies a few confusions set up by my opponents.   NB: Many thanks as you have greatly helped clarify my thinking on these issues, which is what I come here for.



dmb says:
Actually, your response makes it quite clear that I didn't help you at all. If your thinking had been clarified by my explanation, you wouldn't continue to defend the nonsensical idea of "pre-conceptual static quality". If you understood what I'm saying, you'd realize that the phrase is a contradiction in terms. Since static quality is conceptual, the phrase means "pre-conceptual concepts". And so the phrase and the idea are nonsense.

It's also quite clear that you don't understand what SOM actually is, despite my efforts. This is saddening, but not terribly surprising. 


Pretty sure I just can't help you, David.