[MD] Putting SOM back into the MOQ by excluding SQ, let's not do that say some of us
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sat May 4 05:34:23 PDT 2013
Hi David,
I prefer to separate conceptual patterns (language) and perceptual patterns (taste, touch, smell, sight and sound). But I've never gotten a clear understanding if others think the same way. My understanding is based on being able to drop conceptual process while maintaining a more direct perceptual process (mindful awareness). But I consider Dynamic Quality indivisible, undifferentiated, unpatterned, in other words, an without either concepts or percepts - So I think I am agreeing with you.
Marsha
> D. Morey said:
> ...DMB and Dan seem to think DQ is a flux with content, odd use of the word flux. Up to you really do you prefer pre-conceptual SQ, pretty sensible notion, or flux with content? -bit odd. ...Hope that clarifies a few confusions set up by my opponents. NB: Many thanks as you have greatly helped clarify my thinking on these issues, which is what I come here for.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list