[MD] Putting SOM back into the MOQ by excluding SQ, let's not do that say some of us

[MarshaV]

Greetings,

Just to try to be clear...  For me, pre-conceptual indicates direct perception (mindfulness), and not Dynamic Quality which is indivisible, unpatterned.   


Marsha
 


On May 4, 2013, at 8:34 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

Hi David,

I prefer to separate conceptual patterns (language) and perceptual patterns (taste, touch, smell, sight and sound).  But I've never gotten a clear understanding if others think the same way.  My understanding is based on being able to drop conceptual process while maintaining a more direct perceptual process (mindful awareness).  But I consider Dynamic Quality indivisible, undifferentiated, unpatterned, in other words, it's without either concepts or percepts - So I think I am agreeing with you.  


Marsha 



> D. Morey said: 
> ...DMB and Dan seem to think DQ is a flux with content, odd use of the word flux. Up to you really do you prefer pre-conceptual SQ, pretty sensible notion, or flux with content? -bit odd.  ...Hope that clarifies a few confusions set up by my opponents.   NB: Many thanks as you have greatly helped clarify my thinking on these issues, which is what I come here for.