[MD] SOM & the MOQ's four levels
Ant McWatt
antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk
Sat May 4 20:18:22 PDT 2013
Dan G said to Ron, Arlo, DMB et al, May 4th 2013:
> Experience is pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between
> experience and recognition. Dr. Gurr seems to go into this a bit in the
> paper that Ant shared. William James also goes into this, which RMP quotes
> in Lila. Experience and our conception of experience are never identical.
> Once we have pigeon-holed experience into categories it is no longer
> experience. It becomes a memory of experience, or in the MOQ, static
> quality.
Ant McWatt comments:
Dan,
Just a small refinement but I think it would be clearer if you added the prefix "pure" to the word experience in the above paragraph as static quality patterns are a form of experience too (though a type of conceptualised/patterned experience)!
e.g
"Pure experience (i.e. unpatterned Quality/Dynamic Quality) is pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between pure experience and recognition...."
Best wishes,
Ant
.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list