[MD] SOM & the MOQ's four levels

[David Harding]

Good luck Ant,

If you'll look at the thread in the archives - 'Is experience just DQ?' - I've tried to show Dan time and time again that rather than just see that there is 'experience' he recognise that there is a difference between 'pure' experience and the experience of static quality. So far to no avail.  But then I think what is shaping his staunch view on this is what he values.  Maybe he'll value your opinion enough here to take a second look? Dan? 

djh

On 05/05/2013, at 1:18 PM, Ant McWatt <antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> Dan G said to Ron, Arlo, DMB et al, May 4th 2013:
> 
>> Experience is pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between
>> experience and recognition. Dr. Gurr seems to go into this a bit in the
>> paper that Ant shared. William James also goes into this, which RMP quotes
>> in Lila. Experience and our conception of experience are never identical.
>> Once we have pigeon-holed experience into categories it is no longer
>> experience. It becomes a memory of experience, or in the MOQ, static
>> quality.
> 
> 
> Ant McWatt comments:
> 
> Dan,
> 
> Just a small refinement but I think it would be clearer if you added the prefix "pure" to the word experience in the above paragraph as static quality patterns are a form of experience too (though a type of conceptualised/patterned experience)! 
> 
> e.g
> 
> "Pure experience (i.e. unpatterned Quality/Dynamic Quality) is pre-conceptual.  That is why there is always a lag between pure experience and recognition...."
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Ant
> 
> 
> 
> . 		 	   		  
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html