[MD] Putting SOM back into the MOQ by excluding SQ, let's not do that say some of us

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sun May 5 01:37:01 PDT 2013


Hi Joe,

I am not understanding what you are saying, nor how it related to my statement.


Marsha 
 

On May 4, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> A logic of reality describes differentiation in terms of individuality.
> This becomes the metaphysical base for mathematical logic.
> 
> DQ/SQ Metaphysics accepts evolution in indefinable/definable terms DQ/SQ
> existence.  DQ/SQ existence accepts indefinable experience DQ, definable
> experience SQ.  A complete structure for evolution awaits elaboration.
> 
> I suggest the musical scale or the color spectrum, both with differing
> intervals, be used as a model for disparate levels of evolutionary patterns
> in existence. 
> 
> IMHO Dynamic/Static describe modality in levels in existence indefinable DQ,
> definable SQ reality, DQ/SQ metaphysics awaits further elaboration.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 5/4/13 5:34 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> But I consider Dynamic Quality indivisible, undifferentiated, unpatterned, in
>> other words, it's without either concepts or percepts - So I think I am agreeing
>> with you.  
> 
> 
> 



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list