[MD] Static Patterns Rock!
Andre
andrebroersen at gmail.com
Thu Oct 17 10:32:44 PDT 2013
Marsha to dmb & Andre:
The purpose of mystic meditation is not to remove oneself from
experience but to bring one's self closer to it by eliminating stale,
confusing, static, intellectual attachments of the past. " (LILA, Chapter 9)
I have no direct experience of the atomic bombs that dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Tell me what you know of the atomic bombs that
dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and how you know it?
Andre:
And this is your 'defense' regarding your conditional and hypothetical
moral denial (!) of the reality of the dropping of the atomic bombs and
the horror called the holocaust? Appealing to your vipassana injunctions?
The incredible horror of your stance and its implications are beyond
your intellectual grasp. You literally fail to comprehend the
implications of what you are saying.
Because you did not have 'direct experience' of it? Bloody hell! Those
that DID directly experience it are DEAD Lucy. In your warped and
bigoted way of reasoning those few that survived came close but did not
have the same direct experience. So what do they know eh? And what did
they leave behind for us?
What a pathetic, morally contemptible response totally at odds with the
MoQ. And not only with the MoQ.
All of the perennial philosophies, all the wisdom traditions, all the
saints and sages over the past few millennia who stuck their heads out
to teach, advise and assist and write when and where needed. Some were
even killed for it. Marsha does not even speak from the perspective of
'the wold of the buddhas'.
Do you think they did that because they were convinced that sq patterns
were 'like an illusion'?
May as well discuss whether the actions of a Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol
Pot, Mugabe, Idi Amin, Nixon, Bush and many others, (responsible for the
killing of over 100 million people during the last century) were
'conditionally', or 'like an illusion' real or not. The promulgation of
this sort of reasoning undermines the MoQ to no end and I doubt very
much if Pirsig himself is impressed with this (alleged) (ab)use of his
MoQ interpretation. And I mention this because she cites Anthony's PhD
and Pirsig's writings to legitimize these claims.
I would go so far as thinking that any poster here on this discuss would
find this unacceptable. But, apart from dmb's efforts no-one has
reacted.We find ourselves having to defend and justify a moral position
that acknowledges mankind's worst atrocities (the very center of some of
the moral codes Pirsig identified) as real as rocks and trees and find
this position opposed by an anti-intellectualism and subjective
solipsism that does not seem to have any bounds. If there is one it is
surrounded by egotistical narcissism.
I urge Horse to take some sort of action. This is doing the Discuss nor
Pirsig's MoQ any good. I openly and blatantly request Marsha (in true
Lucy form) to be removed from this MoQ discussion site, whether is be
temporarily or permanently
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list