[MD] Henry Miller, Philosophy & Sex

[Jan Anders Andersson]

Huh??

http://www.suehepworth.com/2013/03/henry-miller-did-not-marry-marilyn.html

Jan-Anders


12 aug 2014 x kl. 14:38 skrev Ant McWatt <antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk>:

> Too right, Jan. No doubt Henry Miller's understanding of the point you explain below is why - not at a particular young age - he ended up having the confidence to bed the ultimate "sex symbol" (and er... "night nurse") of his era, Marilyn Monroe!
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Ant
> 
> 
> http://moq.robertpirsig.org/
> 
> 
> See also Jan Ander's e-novel: "Money & the Art of Losing Control" at:
> 
> http://www.amazon.com/Money-Losing-Control-Anders-Andersson-ebook/dp/B0087FIEZS
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: jananderses at telia.com, August 12th 2014:
> 
> While Henry Miller wrote about sex pretty well but as a mere Romantic issue, I was writing about sex more from a Classic perspective, with the object/subject of a minor importance. Perverted or no, sex is a strong urge affecting anyones daily life. Those who deny it are liars. A philosophy that doesn’t include sex is not complete.
> 
> ”Astrology deals in potentialities, does it not? I am not interested in the potential man. I am interested in what a man actualizes – or realizes – of his potential being.” 
> 
> (p.320, "Big Sur and the Oranges of Hieronymus Bosch", H Miller).
> 
> Jan-Anders
> 
> .
> 		 	   		  
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html