[MD] Step one

[Jan Anders Andersson]

We all her know that it is a difference, Adam and the clay is way of a romantic expression of the difference but how should a classical person describe it?

A precise definition of the difference might be useful when we are talking to a complete novice for example.

Inorganic patterns have a lifetime if millions of years while organic sturcture last for much shorter time. Organic patterns are reproducing themselves while inorganic are not. Why?

JanAnders

> 30 jan 2014 kl. 19:58 skrev david <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>:
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> As I understand it, the distinction between organic and inorganic is something everyone already understands. It's not something Pirsig invented. It's just the difference between Adam and the clay from which he was formed. It's the difference between rocks and trees, between ants and suns. I don't understand why anyone needs to ask such a question.
> 
> 
>> Jan-Anders:
>> 
>> By inspiration from Andre I'll suggest that we start a discussion about how to define the difference between level one, the inorganic and level two, the organic. I couldn't find any consistent thread in the Archives.
>> 
>> Andre:
>> 'Everything that has not been created by life (defined as DNA) is an inorganic value pattern'. Annot.42
>> 
>> Ipso facto an organic pattern is the 'presence of DNA in a self-perpetuating pattern'. Annot.23
>> 
>> The boundary between inorganic patterns and organic patterns is the virus 'because it is the simplest organism that contains DNA. I have read there is some dispute about the virus being living or dead, and I take this dispute as evidence that it is the boundary' Annotn. 48.
> 
>                         
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html