[MD] Anti-intellectualism revisited

[Jan Anders Andersson]

Hi Ron, and this is also for John

In a MOQ view, the intellectual level carries concepts that are dependent of the social level to be expressed but using the social level for its own purposes. Concepts are not dependant on individuals, names and words, formulas and just any intellectual pattern can be expressed by any individual. Rights or wrongs, good and bad ideas, all can be carried by anyone. People die but good ideas get older than vampires.

Philosophy, Math, Economy, Rhetoric, MD are some of the tools we use to maintain this level.

The meaning of any example of intellectual art is based upon a balance in three aspects; dignity, form and expression.

Jan-Anders



1 jun 2014 x kl. 22.57 skrev Ron Kulp:

> 
> 
>> On Jun 1, 2014, at 2:41 PM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> dmb,
>> 
>>> 
>>> John replied:
>>> I am a bit confused about how intellect can be the 4th level, when intellect is by definition - the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters. And while I can see using the term to mean something different than "objectivity", I wonder if that's a good move, in the end, since words with private definitions don't communicate well.
>>> 
>>> 
> 	Intellect is a term used in studies of thehuman mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems. Historically the term comes from the Greek philosophical term nous, which was translated into Latin as intellectus (derived from the verb intelligere) and into French (and then English) as intelligence.
> Discussion of the intellect can be divided into two broad areas. In both of these areas, the terms "intellect" and "intelligence" have continued to be used as related words.
> 
> Intellect and Nous in philosophy. In philosophy, especially in classical andmedieval philosophy the intellect or nous is an important subject connected to the question of how humans can know things. Especially during late antiquity and the middle ages, the intellect was often proposed as a concept which could reconcile philosophical and scientific understandings of nature withmonotheistic religious understandings, by making the intellect a link between each human soul, and the divine intellect (or intellects) of the cosmos itself. (During the Latin Middle Ages a distinction developed whereby the term "intelligence" was typically used to refer to the incorporeal beings which governed the celestial spheres in many of these accounts.[1]) Also see: passive intellectand active intellect.
> Intellect and Intelligence in psychology. In modern psychology and neuroscience, intelligence and intellect are used as terms describing mental ability (or abilities) that allow people to understand. A distinction is sometimes made whereby intellect is considered to be related to "facts" in contrast to intelligence concerning "feelings".[2]Intellect refers to the cognition and rational mental processes gained through external input rather than internal.
> A person who uses intelligence (thought and reason) and critical or analytical reasoning in either a professional or a personal capacity is often referred to as an intellectual.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html