[MD] Anti-intellectualism revisited

[Ron Kulp]

John,
But you insist Pirsig isn't accounting for something in his explanation 
Now why is that?
Ron

> On Jun 11, 2014, at 12:59 PM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ron,
> 
>> 
>>> I think there is an aspect of intellect, that is very close to DQ.
>>> Intellect is indefinable and yeah, I know everything is, but intellect is
>>> indefinable in a special way - since it's the means of defining as well.
>>> So defining intellect, is most of all,  more a creative art than a
>>> rigorously logical process.
>>> 
>>> That's all I'm sayin'.
>> 
>> Ron;
>> That's all Pirsig is saying.
> Then we are in agreement and there shouldn't be a problem.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html