[MD] MOQ is good. What is it good for?

[Ron Kulp]

> On Oct 12, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It is good to have a solid foundation from which to see, feel, hear and argue. This is not dogma…it is realizing that words are simply pointers. And it is important to get the words right. And once the words are in place they are properly understood…in the context within which they receive their fullest meaning and explanatory power

Ron:
I have been thinking long and hard about
The attempt to recover religion from
The religious, (it seems to me to be
The subject of concern) and I keep 
Going back and forth between the
Well meaning philosopher trying to
Link up their values in such a way
As to maintain as much of the old
Beliefs as they can while not compromising their philosophical
Integrity and the realization that
The old belief system only serves
To corrupt that understanding rendering the project futile and
Inhibitive.
I think, personally, one can link up
Religion with philosophy (particularly
Pirsigs) if they really understand the message. 

That's why agree with a lot of your
Post, if there is a problem with that
Ability to connect, then it's a sign
That perhaps we need to review our
Conceptions.

Thanks Andre