[MD] On Pirsig's letter to Paul Turner

[Adrie Kintziger]

Hi David.
Long time no see....
The assertation would only make sense in an occult environment;(imho);
The way i should suggest to read it,is as a derivative summary of two
different lines of reasoning only.
But  this does not mean the Turner brief is unimportant.It is
dated.Obsolete.
Strange that it keeps bugging people.

Adrie


2016-08-01 17:59 GMT+02:00 david <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>:

>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Tuukka Virtaperko said: "In his letter Pirsig also mentions that the
> argument that the Metaphysics of Quality is not an intellectual formulation
> is not clear to him.
>
> dmb says:
>
> As I read it, Pirsig was referring to the assertion that subject-object
> dualism is equal to the intellectual level and since the MOQ rejects
> subject-object dualism, the MOQ is beyond the intellectual level. When
> Pirsig says this assertion "is not clear to him," he is politely saying
> that the assertion makes no sense. I'm fairly certain that Pirsig is right
> about that.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser