[MD] Rhetoric

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Any metaphysics that explicitly disallows the undefinable concept of 
Quality or Dynamic Quality is contrary to the Metaphysics of Quality. It 
is a cause of irreconcilability. However I do see the empathical cause 
for the point you are making.

Tuk



On 31-Dec-16 15:43, Adrie Kintziger wrote:
> I think its good to read these materials.But things on wiki's are not
> always what they seem.Some are very deceptive.
> In fact, what this author is presenting here is actually nothing more than a
> collection of derivatives from Wittgensteins work on logic.It is spiced and
> salted with some previously known paradoxes in a new disguise.
> The best way of putting it  ,in my opinion,is to regard it as a new attempt
> to launch the Tractatus-logico etc,....explained with the terminology of a
> computerprogrammer, or a very strong logical thinker.And a very intelligent
> thinker,...clearly,this however does not prove him right in any way or
> field.
>
> I don't think it will generate clarifications on reality itself,or add new
> insights;
> it is kinda developed to work as an upide down gearbox,not shifting up, but
> in fact , shifting down further, in a halted car.
>
> I wished you would not take this as critisism, because it is'nt.You should
> explore these things, they are less boring than Wittgenstein,and he was not
> all that clever also.
>
> the only part of critics i have is about your statement, "competitor to the
> moq and amoq", There is no competion,connection,or game to win.
>
>
>
>
> 2016-12-31 8:52 GMT+01:00 Tuukka Virtaperko <mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net>:
>
>> Chris Langan, developer of the CTMU, which is a competitor to the MOQ and
>> AMOQ, does not understand the MOQ.
>>
>> Citing http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_t
>> he_Universe
>>
>> ***
>>
>> On the other hand, mind acts as a filter: that which does not conform to
>> mental categories is irrelevant to perception, and therefore not real.
>> Langan here breaks with Kant, who posited a noumenal reality of
>> "things-in-themselves", independent of the phenomenal reality we perceive.
>> Discarding this "Kantian fallacy", Langan rejects noumena as oxymoronic
>> "inconceivable concepts"[21] and holds that phenomenal reality, as the only
>> reality we can know, is the only reality there is.
>>
>> ***
>>
>> This means Langan's understanding of philosophy is at the level of ZAMM.
>> It is not at the level of LILA. The phenomenal reality is romantic quality.
>> Langan is oblivious to Dynamic Quality.
>>
>> Tuk
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus