[MD] "RMP: Ignoramous or fraud?

John Carl ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 10:50:27 PDT 2016


My apologies.  I'm getting old I guess, I thought it was Whitehead but
you're right Andre of course Andre.


sheesh, how embarrasing.  I guess we all know who the REAL ignoramus is.

mea culpa

John



On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>
wrote:

> John:
> So "ignoramous" non-perjorativel then, but the fact is, he DID at least
> read some AN Whitehead.  Quotes him
> from reading his book on history of philosophy, in the bowels of the
> troopship.
>
> dmb:
> And speaking of fraudulent ignoramuses, nobody around here will be
> surprised if John has tried to slander Pirsig or if has dishonestly tried
> to smuggle in a theistic view. Again. It's like a hobby, I guess. Trolls
> will be trolls.
>
> Andre:
> And not only that but John bases the slander on false claims he invents
> himself. Phaedrus did not read A.N. Whitehead at all in the bowels of the
> troopship! He was reading F.S.C. Northrop ‘ The Meeting of East and West”.
> A simple reference to page 117 of ZMM will suffice (Corgi edition).
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
"finite players
play within boundaries.
Infinite players
play *with* boundaries."



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list