[MD] "RMP: Ignoramous or fraud?

[John Carl]

And admittedly, I was trying to get a rise out of y'all.  So at least that
worked.  Thanks dmb for the link to the comparison by Sneddon.  Very
helpful.

jc

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:

> My apologies.  I'm getting old I guess, I thought it was Whitehead but
> you're right Andre of course Andre.
>
>
> sheesh, how embarrasing.  I guess we all know who the REAL ignoramus is.
>
> mea culpa
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> John:
>> So "ignoramous" non-perjorativel then, but the fact is, he DID at least
>> read some AN Whitehead.  Quotes him
>> from reading his book on history of philosophy, in the bowels of the
>> troopship.
>>
>> dmb:
>> And speaking of fraudulent ignoramuses, nobody around here will be
>> surprised if John has tried to slander Pirsig or if has dishonestly tried
>> to smuggle in a theistic view. Again. It's like a hobby, I guess. Trolls
>> will be trolls.
>>
>> Andre:
>> And not only that but John bases the slander on false claims he invents
>> himself. Phaedrus did not read A.N. Whitehead at all in the bowels of the
>> troopship! He was reading F.S.C. Northrop ‘ The Meeting of East and West”.
>> A simple reference to page 117 of ZMM will suffice (Corgi edition).
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "finite players
> play within boundaries.
> Infinite players
> play *with* boundaries."
>
>


-- 
"finite players
play within boundaries.
Infinite players
play *with* boundaries."