[MD] Annotations to LC

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Adrie,

it's too bad I'm using my "4 messages per day" do just issue short 
corrections, but:


>> Confusion, yes, lila's child itself became as ment to be a 
>> clarification,
>> a clarifusion only, a word salad so to speak and it was not Pirsig 
>> who was
>> to blame.

I understand what kind of a work you would've liked LC to become. 
Something like a "bunch of knowledgeable people discussing things and 
reaching relevant conclusions". But it's more like "a bunch of people 
speculate and Pirsig declares clarifications".

However, that doesn't prevent me from commenting Pirsig's 
clarifications. I'm kind of required to do so, actually. Otherwise Dan 
wouldn't believe the Heinous Quadrilemma applies. He'd believe there 
could be something in LC that would render my critique invalid. And 
there almost was.

Regards,
Tuk

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus