[MD] Why does Pirsig write everybody's right about mind and matter although his theses imply the opposite?
Tuukka Virtaperko
mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net
Sat Oct 22 05:57:46 PDT 2016
Dmb,
On 21-Oct-16 23:19, david wrote:
> Tuk said to dmb:
>
>
> I do see the point in making helpful simplifications about subjects being social and intellectual and objects being inorganic and biological. But what is the real deal about subjects and objects?
>
>
>
> dmb says:
>
>
> The real deal with subjects and objects is that they are not real.
Tuukka:
I find it possible to interpret your reply within a subjective or
objective framework. Furthermore, according to the primary empirical
reality I experience there's nothing else I can do with your message
that would be useful. But you state that I'd render your reply unreal by
doing so. I don't wish to render your reply unreal, so I'm compelled not
to address the rest of your message.
Regards,
Tuk
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list