[MF] reality: interactions or quality?
Ant McWatt
antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk
Thu Feb 16 18:53:33 PST 2006
Ted Cole asked Kevin Perez: Are you saying that a good metaphysics should be
more popular at
this point if it is really any good?
Kevin Perez replied February 16th: I'm trying to get at the root of the
Metaphysics of Quality.
Ant McWatt comments:
Kevin,
I don't know if this will help you but this evening I was just re-reading
this e-mail I received from Henry Gurr (the emeritus physics professor who
gives ZMM to his students to read) last March:
Pirsig (and Owen Barfield**) remind us that:
ALL of this Physics and Cosmology exist only in our minds. So we better
remember that these "projections of physics and cosmology" have no
reality... we don't know "reality" and will never know "reality". We just
have these plausible gigantic stories we tell ourselves. The stories just
happen to have utility when you sit down to fix a motorcycle!
As for reading, I would think that Brian Green's popular book on
?"Cosmology"? or Steven Hawkings book on "A Brief History of Time" would
not steer you too wrong. I keep up with articles in "Physics Today" and
"Science" Magazine and "The American Scientist"...
But do NOT look for any of these writers to help you with Pirsig's
"Operation of Value" in the Quantum World. Unless they specifically mention
Pirsig, they will be totally into the dualistic thinking and completely
unaware of the limitations. In fact as they discuss their theories, they are
both thinking and talking about these as Reality, even though they should
know better.
Pirsig is telling us that Value is a name that we give for the unknown that
makes it all go. And makes us go (inside of us). It is unknown. We shall
never know it. We must work with, and make sense of what we see, assuming
that something there is an earlier cause that "makes the world go". We can
try to project backwards from what we know, to something earlier in an
assumed causal chain. Our discoveries can take us earlier and earlier in an
assumed causal chain. But earlier is ALL we may expect. We can't get back to
the origin of value.
Like the zero moment of: 1) the Big Bang, 2) absolute zero Kelvin on the
temperature scale, or 3) the infinitesimal of Calculus, we will never get to
the "origin".
Reality and the source of reality will remain forever unknown. There is no
God's Eye level of seeing for us.
** See "Saving the Appearances" by Owen Barfield. This book is very
difficult to read. But is also very rewarding. It agrees with and covers
territory that overlaps with Pirsig.
-----------end------------
.
_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger
7.5 today! http://messenger.msn.co.uk
More information about the Moq_Focus
mailing list