[MF] Onward and downward!

[MarshaV]

At 06:36 AM 2/19/2006, Steve wrote:

>hahaha...Now THERE's an interesting twist!
>
>Of course you REALISE Marsha, that now 'we' have to dissect what 
>'qualities' and levels of love (Love?) exist and that is sure to 
>provoke a similar result of Metaphysical perceptions...

I don't think it should.  The concept of love is a description of a 
high quality experience.  Once it is experienced, it is subject to 
the static quality that affects all re-interpretation.  If a person 
holds the belief (static quality) that the high quality experience 
called love can only be gotten through an interpersonal or religious 
experience, they are filtering out a huge amount of dynamic experience.

I think it's enough to know love represent a high quality experience 
with the MOQ.  I see no reason to interpret or intellectualize 
individual experiences.  I do see value in detaching it from as much 
static quality as possible and going for the dynamic.


While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served.
                      (LILA, Chapter 32)

Marsha