[MF] Backwards & Upwards

[MarshaV]

At 03:38 AM 2/21/2006, you wrote:
>Thanks for your thoughts Marsha, I read them with interest.
>
>
>
>
Are you then amending your stance on  "The 
>concept of love is a description of a high 
>quality experience" to elaborating that the 
>'concept' of love CAN BE "...a description of a 
>high quality experience", OR a "low [or anything 
>in between or a multiplicity of] qualities"?

Yes, I am amending the word 'is' to 'can be' 
.  Culturally it 'tends to be' associated with a 
high quality experience but that would be within 
a range of understanding.  And I suppose it can 
further be modified by individual baggage.  The 
words and reinterpretation are not as important a 
dynamic (without baggage) experience.


>PS; I like your label of 'baggage' being a 
>"static Quality", although IS 'baggage' 
>[memories?] a hard and fast STATIC 
>quality?  Personally I have found that many 
>items of 'baggage' tend to morph into lesser [or 
>greater] ranks of qualities as one gets older 
>[and wiser?] or simply succumb to the effects of dementia or the ilk.

Well, how about morphing baggage?  Everything is 
in a state of change, even static quality.


Marsha