[MD] Choosing Chance
John Carl
ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 15:35:12 PST 2010
Oh proponent of the metophisics of rAndoMness, or MOr,
Or should I say, "hpownfkfm da'spfddocvm"
or whatever random thing pops into my mind.
which is probably the way you see me anyway so what's the difference?
nothing really matters, I hear ya. whyevenpayattentin to any qqulalaitya
ata all..'dclkpe
I mean, from my perspective, if randomness is the metaphysical center of
existence and nothing really matters, there is no good.
What a ridiculously non-good idea.
Or put a nother way what a random idea.
I'd tuck the mOr back into yer noggin krimel and try shakin' something
gooder out.
Perchance a new Avatarian perception is required.
Yours as ever,
J Carl
> [Krimel]
> I say it is better to embrace randomness and our responses to it, as
> integral to epistemology and metaphysics. Evolution is entirely about how
> static patterns emerge and persist in a random universe. Until the MoQ
> wises
> up on this score, the "big picture" it offers will remain a shadow of what
> might have been if Pirsig hadn't chicken out on his Metaphysics of
> Randomness.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list