[MD] Choosing Chance

John Carl ridgecoyote at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 15:35:12 PST 2010


Oh proponent of the metophisics of rAndoMness, or MOr,

Or should I say, "hpownfkfm da'spfddocvm"

or whatever random thing pops into my mind.

which is probably the way you see me anyway so what's the difference?
 nothing really matters, I hear ya.  whyevenpayattentin to any qqulalaitya
ata all..'dclkpe

I mean, from my perspective, if randomness is the metaphysical center of
existence and nothing really matters, there is no good.

What a ridiculously non-good idea.

Or put a nother way  what a random idea.

I'd tuck the mOr back into yer noggin krimel and try shakin' something
gooder out.

Perchance a new Avatarian perception is required.


Yours as ever,

J  Carl




> [Krimel]
> I say it is better to embrace randomness and our responses to it, as
> integral to epistemology and metaphysics. Evolution is entirely about how
> static patterns emerge and persist in a random universe. Until the MoQ
> wises
> up on this score, the "big picture" it offers will remain a shadow of what
> might have been if Pirsig hadn't chicken out on his Metaphysics of
> Randomness.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list