[MD] New Model Army, Mystic(DQ) Experience, and Religion (SQ) as Power
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Wed Aug 2 09:10:54 PDT 2006
[Steve H]
No. I don't believe God is made in the image of man. How you or New Model
Army came to that conclusion I'm not sure. I worship God, not the
church. The church is presently flawed and has a leadership vacuum, much
in the same way the United States is presently flawed and has a leadership
vacuum. But you wouldn't argue for destroying the United States, only the
church because it's all the church's fault!
[Arlo]
The "Church" professes that the only path to salvation is through accepting
the divinity of Jesus Christ (as do all "churches" of their respective
"saviour"). Do you believe this?
"In the image of man" I read to mean the human-deity worship that precisely
is worshiping Christ. If your "God" is not tied to specific orthodox
doctrine, why call yourself a "Christian"?
[Steve]
I feel the MD group is attempting to identify religion as the scapegoat and
cause to all its problems. I feel this is a dangerous path to take. But
you find value in turning the MD group into a fascist cult. Sobeit.
[Arlo]
As was clear in my post, I identify as a problem the literalization of
mystic experience. As a guide, such metaphor is useful (and sometimes
necessary). But to lock that metaphor into one particular "religion" is
ludicrous. As such "organized religion" that professes that it alone holds
the key to enlightenment, and that subserviation to its static structure is
required for that enlightenment, is indeed in my humble opinion worth
condemning. Those who believe, for example, that Lakota who believe of
White Buffalo Calf Woman are any less on the path to "Heaven" as those who
believe of Jesus Christ are worshipping the Church as an "image of man".
Christianity may be an adequate path to understanding for YOU, and so long
as you are okay with THAT, there is no problem. When the message becomes
that it must be a path for EVERYONE, your condemning of "fascist cults" is
pure hypocrisy.
No one is condemning spirituality. If you've found it via Christianity,
hey, all power to you. Personally I find its metaphor weak in relation to
other explanatory myths. Its focus on the masculine, for example, is sad.
Buddhism, for example, I consider much more powerful metaphorically, as do
I many of the indigenous myths used by peoples that see them as part of the
world, inhabited throughout by The Godhead. But that's just me.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list