[MD] New Model Army, Mystic(DQ) Experience, and Religion (SQ) as Power
Ant McWatt
antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk
Thu Aug 3 02:52:33 PDT 2006
Ant McWatt stated August 2nd:
To cut to the chase, I think the issue of religion (and especially the
exploitation of Fundamentalist Christians by neo-cons) is just one of those
smokescreens often used by unscrupulous politicians to ensure their
materially comfortable lifestyle continues. The War on Terror is another
myth designed to scare the US and UK population into being more submissive
and pliable for the same end. More detail for these points is provided by
the Power of Nightmares TV documentary that Khaled and Arlo recently
highlighted; the entire scripts for the documentary being at:
http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
Finally, I still think that most everyday people calling themselves
Christians or Muslims are sincere about their beliefs but, to return to a
point I made a couple of days ago, if you rely on the static baggage of
someone else (whether thats a parent or the Catholic Church) when dealing
with the Divine (rather than approach it directly), youre going to leave
yourself open to political and financial exploitation. This type of
exploitation is also why writers such as Mark Twain implied that anyone who
_wants_ to hold high office should be carefully scrutinised for their
motivations in doing so!
Steve H commented to Ant August 2nd:
And your solution is to get rid of all [institutionalised] religion? I see
the problem
being the vacuum of leadership at the top. In other posts I have
shown my disgust with President Bush, I believe he and his cronies are
more of a problem than all of organized religion. It is them who
encourage the continued ignorance of the population and feed on the
population's lust for instant gratification.
Ant McWatt comments:
Steve,
I think Bush and his cronies are happy to use organised religion in as far
as it secures them power. So yes, I agree with you in that such politicians
are more of a problem than organized religion. As such, my solution is not
to get rid of all institutionalised religion but to change the system/s that
gives power to dubious politicians such as those presently leading the US
and the UK.
Regarding institutionalised religion, I was simply saying that if you are
trusting your spiritual life to other people (as part of an established
sect), you have to be that more careful about what beliefs you are exactly
accepting and how the social organizations underlying these beliefs are
being controlled and influenced. I suppose there is an element of trust
there with church authorities analogous with trusting the mass media etc
that a country I have never visited on the TV news _really_ exists or that
the 69 moon landings _really_ did happen. Most people just can be bothered
or lack the time to check up on such things properly.
Moreover, if I am a mystic then I just need to be aware of the moral issues
I come across on my individual path (to enlightenment) while if I become a
member of the Catholic Church, for instance, then what the priest says in
his weekly sermon or what the financial dealings of the Vatican City are or
what the Popes public comments on AIDS or women or institutionalised child
abuse also then become my concern and, as a member of that Church, my
responsibility. Personally, its not the kind of responsibility Id like to
be burdened with.
Best wishes,
Anthony.
.
_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list