[MD] Pressed Ham
david buchanan
dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Sat Aug 19 16:16:48 PDT 2006
Ham said:
...I had developed Essentialism prior to my reading of Prisig, and have
taken a metaphysical position that is in some ways "at odds with" Pirsig's
conclusions. ...I have always been open with regard to these differences,
explaining them to those who expressed interest, and answering questions
from those who suspected that I had "some other agenda". Indeed, until
recently I had assumed that, with some modification, the two philosophies
were compatible. Now, however, DMB, Ian and (possibly) Jos have indicated
that Essentialism is conceptually irreconcilable with the MoQ, effectively
suggesting that I don't belong here.
dmb replies:
Oh Jeez, you're such a drama queen. Nobody was asking you to leave because
of the incompatibility. As a matter of fact, I was asking you to participate
in a conversation about that incompatibility. I even suggested a very
specific way to do it, using quotes and explanations I already provided.
Remember?
But I think you might be too attached your Essentialism. I also think this
"Hamilton Martyr Show" might just be your way of changing the subject.
You're afraid I might be right, huh? (Now I've resorted to taunting.) Ha! I
double-dare you to stay and (gasp) actually talk about it! (Insert Sound FX:
Diabolical Laughter with echo.)
Mellow-dramatically yours,
dmb
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list