[MD] Quantum Physics

[Heather Perella]

     [Dan G.]
> If quality talk doesn't notice distinctions then
> what prevents gibberish?

     Quality does notice distinctions, and doesn't. 
Quality is dq and sq.  What does dq-sq without any
split, be?  It depends on 'perspective'.  If you don't
want gibberish, then sq is distinctions, and that's
quality.  If you do want gibberish, then dq is
nondistinctions, and that's quality.  Gibberish is
quality.  Gibberish is static pattern and we
intellectualize gibberish.  We don't notice 'anything'
when we gibberish and that's noticing nothing - oooh,
dq is here.

     [Dan G.]
> Perhaps the MOQ would say quantum physics is a
> package of highly specialized 
> intellectual patterns of value. Not at all as
> romantic as you make it sound 
> but still highly effective.

     As, David M. said, All ripples of nothing. 
Consciousness changes is quarks changing.  What do you
notice?  Static patterns, dynamic quality, or just
quality.  Surely all, and all is nothing:  nothing is
all.  Pinch this arm, am I dreaming - sure a real
dream.  It doesn't matter if I'm on this quantum
physics thread or not.  This is code of art - quality
is sqin'-dq and dqin'-sq.  Dynamic morality morally
judging, static levels appear and disappear as dynamic
morality is codifying art on all levels.  What will
this be is what it is.  Perspective is code of art:
moral judgments: each level: and no-level. 
Definitions of dq and sq and quality, that's all I
keep saying, no more, no less.

woods,
SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com