[MD] Quantum Physics

[Heather Perella]

     [Ant]
> I think from the conventional view of the MOQ, you
> are conflating the code 
> of Art with the Quality Event.  A Quality Event can
> follow a static path 
> (i.e. what has been traditionally regarded as good)
> _or_ a new Dynamic “code 
> of Art” path (which has never been tried before).

     This 'which-has-never-been-tried-before' can
happen on all levels.  And as you may have noticed, I
did agree with you, and did not just flatly say quan.
mechn. is a quality event.  I made distinctions and
said quan. mechn. occurs on the one level.  Yet, as
David M. is pointing out perspective can change all
the levels.  What I think can match the inorganic
level.  Yet, quan. mechn. itself works on the
inorganic level when we make clear distinctions, so, I
agreed with you.

     [Ant] 
> Moreover, as I noted in 
> my original comment above, there are better
> explanations for most macro 
> scale behaviour than those provided by quantum
> mechanics.  For instance, 
> does an anthropologist or a politician have any use
> for quantum theory (or 
> even physics) in understanding social patterns of
> value?

     The field of quantum theory can ripple
suggestions into anthro. and politic. and vice versa. 
Yet, I know what you mean.


     [Ant]
  And even within 
> the field of physics, Newtonian mechanics is
> sometimes better to use than 
> quantum mechanics when calculating the movement of
> relatively large scale 
> objects (because its formulae are simpler and
> quicker to use).

    sure

woods,
SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.