[MD] Quantum Physics

[PhaedrusWolff at carolina.rr.com]

>     Consciousness, as in involves a way about itself,
> I would say is clear.  Consciousness is clear. 
> Consciousness conforms to whatever is being
> emphasized.  Consciousness doesn't emphasize, and is
> not selfish in stating what is to be noticed. 
> Consciousness doesn't have an outside agenda. 
> Consciousness goes along with anything and even
> nothing in particular.  The emphasis or direction
> applied upon channeling consciousness is perspective
> maybe?  Thus, what we are conscious of is due to our
> perspective, and from here, perspective is cultivated
> and built upon by numerous sources.  As I stated, it
> seems, consciousness is clear and involves no agenda
> of its' own, except for what consciousness is, thus,
> does involve a way about itself.  Consciousness is
> influenced and directed by perspective which would
> seem to hold 'gravitational' type influence. 
> Perspective pulls us here or over there.  When
> perspective and consciousness line-up and perspective
> is let go, then perspective is mu, clear, and dq is
> involved.  

Hi SA,

This paints a good mental picture of what consciousness is. Very good. 

SA)
>     Stuck and stuckness are terms Pirsig uses in ZMM.
> I know Pirsig uses stuckness when it comes to
> trappings that close one off from dynamic quality.  I
> don't know if Pirsig uses these terms in this way or
> not, but I would venture to say that being stuck is a
> latch too tight, too tense, and too strong.  Stuck
> upon dq, though, is latching upon dq, thus, upon
> nothing.  Yet, to stick, and keep sticking and
> latching upon dq is also keeping in mind that
> something is present that is continually able to stick
> and latch upon dq.  Therefore, this continually
> latching by something, without getting particular,
> this something is sq.  Thus, this continual effort is
> acknowledging that the distinction of sq is still
> lurking, latching, and not going away as sq is stuck
> upon latching dq.  This kind of stuckness is old,
> ancient, and since MoQ is defining a reality, thus,
> this reality must be old and ancient, for, evolution
> is mentioned, and the value patterns latching and
> levels linked from inorganic to intellect.  Thus,
> being stuck upon dq allows for dq, and is an old,
> original intellectualized latch helping society(ies). 
> To be stuck upon ego is a latching that is shutting
> out dq.  Stuckness, at least as I see it, can go
> either way.  Stuck with dq or stuck with sq, which the
> latter would not or fainting acknowledge dq and these
> are the trappings Pirsig mentions in ZMM.  The former
> acknowledges sq is still here, thus, sq isn't
> destroyed.

Chin) I wasn’t thinking you can be stuck on DQ. Once DQ is accepted, 
it becomes sq. 

What you think?