[MD] tiny skull... change... nothingness...

[Micah]

David,

Shared objective reality, the same as for you.

Micah

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org]On Behalf Of David M
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:33 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] tiny skull... change... nothingness...


Hi Micah

What does exist for you Micah?

David m


----- Original Message -----
From: "Micah" <micah at roarkplumbing.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] tiny skull... change... nothingness...


> SA,
>
> I would say that "infinite" and "nothing" are both human mental concepts
> that don't exist in reality.
>
> Micah
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org]On Behalf Of Heather Perella
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:12 PM
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] tiny skull... change... nothingness...
>
>
>     I don't want to get into multiple posts with you
> Ham, but I couldn't resist commenting on this one.
>
>     [Ham]
>> Your statement makes sense only in the context of
>> finite existence, and you
>> have qualified it with the words "in our finite
>> terms."  What I am
>> suggesting is that ultimate reality cannot be
>> defined in finite terms, and
>> that it cannot be "Nothing".
>
>     Infinite and Nothing, to me, go hand and hand.
> I'm getting the feeling that you believe that Absolute
> Essence knows everything, is all-knowing thus can't be
> nothing.  If so, this is why I also veer from your
> thesis.  I believe ultimate reality doesn't know
> what's coming next.  Whatever foresight ultimate
> reality has, I'm sure it's more than mine, on some
> kind of larger scale, but I also believe ultimate
> reality has the capability to make something totality
> new, even to itself.
>
>
>     [Ham]
> Essence is not subject to divisions or
>> levels because it is
>> absolute.
>
>     Those levels are not discrete divisions.  The
> levels overlap each other, and at the same time are
> able to be specific enough.  It's the tree is a tree,
> and a tree is a proton, electron, etc...  Different
> levels overlapping each other, dependent upon each
> other.  You can define one level, but never totally
> depend on the definition of one level to completely
> define the universe.  The universe has many
> overlapping levels with specific levels that overlap
> and combine levels to have proton be a tree and a
> proton can be the sun, etc...
>
> Anyways...
>
> SA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> ________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/