[MD] guidebook/primer

[ian glendinning]

You bet Marsha,

Make sure you nominate a women or two to the "editorial team".
(refer Arlo's comments)

Concensus by the way is dynamic, that's my point.
The danger of treating it as static is in its interpretation by priests.
Exegesis.
Regards
Ian

On 10/11/06, MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
>
>
> Greetings All,
>
> Leave it to a group of men to f*ck up something that is pure and
> beautiful.  We have the author's own words.  Do you think you can do
> better?  Do you want to create static definitions by consensus?  Do
> you want to add what is missing?  Maybe there is an ambiguous part
> you'd like to drop?   Next you'll want to proclaim that women are
> biological creatures.
>
> I've always thought this MD Discuss a place where mental monkeys
> (myself included) can explore and stretch their understanding of the MOQ.
>
> Has anyone asked RMP what he thinks of this group creating a
> guidebook or primer??????
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>