[MD] Biological Quality & Social Conservatism

[David M]

Hi SA

I'd suggest that the self-limiting of what is possible by DQ
is what creates the cosmos and SQ.

David M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Heather Perella" <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Biological Quality & Social Conservatism


>> > [Arlo]
>> > > From whose intellect do we derive the right of
>> "free speech"...Well, I> suppose
>> > the "literal" answer would be, in this case, a
>> "consensus of
>> > > learned individuals appealing to philosophy and
>> reason".
>
>     [Craig]
>> > Or did the right of free speech come first & some
>> "consensus of learnedindividuals
>> > appealing to philosophy and reason" start to limit
> it.
>
>     [Platt]
>> Excellent point, Craig. Never thought of it that
> way. Thanks.
>
>
>     Craig, this is an excellent point.  I find this
> actually to be the whole point of the MOQ.
> Awesome!!!!  Yes, static quality and its' limits and
> boundaries, but dynamic quality with its' inherent no
> limits and no boundaries.  This sq and dq mix flow
> nicely with nature.  We limit to find that limit
> broken, but then also, the limits of sq are set in
> place, but they change, etc...
>
> crickets,
> SA
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Got a little couch potato?
> Check out fun summer activities for kids.
> http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>