[MD] Reet and the Weakest Link
Platt Holden
plattholden at gmail.com
Tue Aug 5 08:34:42 PDT 2008
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Ron Kulp <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com> wrote:
>
>
> [Craig]
> I still think "experience is reality" is too glib, out of context.
> Better would be:
> 7') . Experience doesn't need a system of relations to be real. It is
> already real.
>
> Ron:
> An excellent list Craig, I would say experience doesn't need a system of
> relations to be real but it does require a system of relations to be
> understood. (hot stove).
>
> Hi Ron:
Pirsig says reality doesn't require a system of relations to be understood.
"Quality doesn't have to be defined. You understand it without definition,
ahead of definition. Quality is a direct experience independent of and prior
to intellectual abstractions." (Lila, 5)
Probably just a difference between you and Pirsig about the meaning of
"understand."
Platt
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list