[MD] What is SOM?
david buchanan
dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Sat Aug 30 11:48:05 PDT 2008
Thanks for the "interesting quotes", Marsha. If I follow you here, these are Western scientific versions of the idea of mutual arising, of dependent arising, It is a scientific denial that anything exists independently. This is anti-essentialist physics, no? This is physics outside of the metaphysics of substance, no?
> Thomas Stapp:
>
> "The physical world is "Not a structure built out of independently
> existing non-analysable entities, but rather a web of relationships
> between elements whose meanings arise wholly from their relationship
> to the whole" " An elementary particle is not an independently
> existing non-analysable entity. It is in essence, a set of
> relationships that reach outwards to other things."
> "In conclusion there is definitely not a substantial physical world."
>
>
>
> John Wheeler:
>
> "May the universe in some strange sense be "brought into being" by
> the participation of those who participate?... The vital act is the
> act of participation. "Participator" is the incontrovertible new
> concept given by quantum mechanics. It strikes down the term "ob
> server" of classical theory, the man who stands safely behind the
> thick glass wall and watches what goes on without taking part. It
> can't be done, quantum mechanics says."
>
>
>
> Werner Heisenberg:
>
> "What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our
> method of questioning".
> "...we never can know what actually goes on in the invisible
> subatomic realm, and that, therefore, we should "abandon all attempts
> to construct perceptual models of atomic processes".
>
>
>
> Niels Bohr:
>
> ".. an independent reality in the ordinary physical sense can be
> ascribed neither to the phenomena nor to the agencies of observation."
> "Isolated material particles are abstractions, their properties
> definable and observable only through their interaction with other systems."
> "Quantum mechanics entails the necessity of a final renunciation of
> classical ideas of causality and a radical revision of our attitude
> towards the problem of physical reality."
>
>
>
> David Bohm:
>
> "Parts are seen to be in immediate connection in which their
> dynamical relationships depend in an irreducible way on the state of
> the whole system and the entire universe. Thus one is lead to a new
> notion of unbroken wholeness which denies the classical idea of an
> analyzability of the world into separate and independently existent parts."
>
>
>
> Robert Oppenheimer:
>
> "If we ask, for instance, whether the position of the electron
> remains the same, we must say 'No'; if we ask whether the electron's
> position changes with time, we must say 'No'; if we ask whether it is
> in motion, we must say 'No'. The Buddha has given such answers when
> interrogated as to the conditions of a man's self after death; but
> they are not familiar answers for the tradition of 17th and 18th
> century science."
>
>
>
> Fritjof Capra (The turning point) sums up the current situation:
>
> "In atomic physics the observed phenomena can be under stood only as
> as correlations between various processes of obser vation and
> measurement, and the end of this chain of processes lies always in
> the consciousness of the human observer. the crucial feature of
> quantum theory is that the observer is not only necessary to observe
> the properties of an atomic phenomenon, but is necessary even to
> bring about these properties. .. The electron does not have objective
> properties independent of my mind. In atomic physics the sharp
> Cartesian division between mind and matter, between the observer and
> the observed, can no longer be maintained. We can never speak about
> nature without, at the same time, speaking about ourselves."
>
>
>
>
> .
> .
>
> Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
> .
> .
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
_________________________________________________________________
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list