[MD] Commie Talk and USA bashing?

[Christoffer Ivarsson]

andre:
> However it appears to me that given this guideline both capitalism and
> socialism belong to the *social level*...and so do governments/ the
> political sector with their interventions (when needed), G8 Summits,
> economic Think tanks, International and National Trade negotiations/
> agreements. etc etc. to ensure some sort of  laissez "fairness"  the whole
> operation i.e this is not intellectualising at the abstract level.
> Their big difference being that capitalism has DQ as its built-in driving
> force and socialism hasn't...and that makes the difference.
>
> But this, of course, contradicts Pirsig's argument who places socialism at
> the intellectual level.

Chris:
No, and for the hundredth time NO.  Capitalism doesn't have DQ as a built in 
driving force. Nothing does. Everyone should stop talking about it, because 
all anyone will EVER talk about is static. I mean, a system that 
incorporates DQ goes against the very core of the MOQ. Things in this world 
may be more or less able to see new Quality, but that's not the same thing.

But You're right. Both a socialist economy and a capitalist one is social 
level stuff. But intellectual and social is very intertwined, and 
intellectual rearranges social to fit it's purpose.  Thus it has to get rid 
of the obstacle that is the markets supremacy.