[MD] in defence of the "relative"

[Matt Kundert]

That hasn't quite been the viewpoint I've been extending, Marsha.  The viewpoint I've been trying to extend to you is something like this:

When you are ready (after your desired period of investigation) to articulate your philosophical viewpoint (which you currently desire to call "relativism"), we can then compare notes between that viewpoint and the philosophical viewpoint we can simply assume for the sake of argument I will still hold at this future date (a viewpoint I currently want to call "pragmatism").

Will there be any difference between your relativism and my pragmatism?  Right now, I think it's 50/50 there will be any substantive differences.

Matt

> Morning Ron,
> 
> Our difference seems to be too great to continue this discussion.  You, Matt
> and Steve seem to prefer pragmatism over relativism, I believe they both may
> compliment the MoQ.  But in the long run, from my point-of-view, there is
> nothing to know and no one to know it, and this makes our disagreeing
> amusing, but trivial, and I'm sure very boring for all other posters.  
> 
>  
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Find the right PC with Windows 7 and Windows Live. 
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/pc-scout/laptop-set-criteria.aspx?cbid=wl&filt=200,2400,10,19,1,3,1,7,50,650,2,12,0,1000&cat=1,2,3,4,5,6&brands=5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16&addf=4,5,9&ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen2:112009