[MD] What's your Quality Balance ratio?

[John Carl]

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Todd A. Carter
<tcarter at activelinkarts.com>wrote:

>
> <Todd>
> I'd be interested in hearing about the former friend.  Hopefully, they did
> not travel down the dynamically biological path you described on their way
> to former-ness.
>
>
 like everything, its a long story...




>
> <Todd>
> John, a community cannot experience quality.  (Though I am still out on
> what
> "the giant" can and cannot do.)  Only individuals have that capacity.
>


Quality can only be defined in experience.  Community is an experience.
 When a classroom full of very different people, all agree that a piece of
writing contains Quality, they are defining that quality in a very real way.
 It's a primary empirical evidence for and of Q's being - the fact that even
though none of us can define it, we ALL (collection of individuals) know
what it is.





> However, individuals can improve their quality, their experience of
> quality,
> their lives more effectively in a society that allows them to share and
> learn from their experiences.
>
>

Just now reading a book attacking the premises of that teaching you are
espousing - the fundamental basis of modern theories of individual and
society are screwed up because they formulate the competing needs of
entities that they don't properly define.

Well, that's a truism around here, eh?






> Thanks for helping me to see that.
>
>
>
thanks for the dialog,

John