[MD] Some historical perspective

Ian Glendinning ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Thu Oct 22 23:59:29 PDT 2009


Precisely my point Marsha.

DQ "kills" intellect
Intellectual PoV's are "superior" to social,
Social PoV's are superior to .... etc .

Absolutetly nothing here with which to recognize or evaluate the
relative merits of different patterns of DQ.
Is any and all DQ equally good ? Total relativism.

This is just too simplistic an iterpretation of MoQ to be of practical value.
Where is the "rationality" for real world decision-making - what is
good, here, now, today my next meal, the next vote ?

Ian

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:07 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> Ian,
>
> 'Cultural heritages and traditions' is really too general a term for
> consideration.  Art, well, that belongs to the Code Of Art process.
> Inferior is not a term I've used for 'cultural heritages and traditions.'  I
> have stated clearly that a shaman may be immensely more intelligent than an
> intellectual.
>
> It is my interpretation that at the moment(now) when action needs to be
> taken one should drop the thinking/ evaluation and 'do the right thing',
> "And what is good, Phædrus, And what is not good...  Need we ask anyone to
> tell us these things?"  For me that is also the meaning of:
>
> "Kill all intellectual patterns.
> Kill them completely
> And then follow Dynamic Quality
> And morality will be served."
>
>
>
> Marsha
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list