[MD] Reading & Comprehension
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Mon May 3 01:16:55 PDT 2010
DMB
1 May. you wrote:
> Pirsig said to Platt and Bo:
(NB, from "Lila's Child" Annotation 133 page 423)
"Therefore to say that the MOQ is based on SOM reasoning is
as useful as saying that the Ten Commandments are based on
SOM reasoning.
As said before look how OBJECTIVELY and ACADEMICALLY - i.e,.
somishly - Pirsig went about to present the Quality Idea in ZAMM. For
it to stand a chance it had to be rationally presented like a wrestler
must use his opponents own momentum to fell him the MOQ had to
use SOM's objective strength to beat it. Had he said that it was
delivered to him on stone tablets (like the ten commandments were
said to be) he would have been the laughing stock of his school.
It doesn't tell us anything about the essence of the Ten
Commandments
Right those must be seen in the light of the social god-run reality.
.....and it doesn't tell us anything about the essence of the
MOQ."
The essence of the MOQ is of course to transcend SOM (the
intellectual level IMO) and a tenet of the MOQ is this "dynamic -
unstable - pattern of the lower level being the vehicle of DQ for the
next development. The MOQ is no static level (I know that) but
somehow it's "out of intellect" so the said tenet applies.
"I think this conclusion undermines the MOQ, ... The MOQ is in
opposition to subject-object metaphysics. To say that it is a
part of that system which it opposes sounds like a dismissal. ...
Course the MOQ is in opposition to the S/O metaphysics , no one
denies that, but it is also plain that the S/O distinction must be kept as
an asset - the MOQ is no return to the past - and it's only and natural
place is the intellectual level, som much of what Pirsig writes indicates
that?
DMB:
> I see a lowering of the quality of the MOQ itself if you follow this
> path of subordinating it to that which it opposes."
I had expected a more "learned" discussion from a MOQ scholar than
this Andre-like "parroting" (learned it from Ron ;).
Bodvar
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list