[MD] [Bulk] Re: Humanism

[118]

Hi Arlo,
I understand what you are saying.  I am fine to drop the questioning about
theism.  I do not believe an appropriate understanding was provided
concerning the anti-theist suggestion, but not all debates have finality.
 If MOQ is anti-theist as Pirsig considers I don't need to pursue the why, I
can move on.  I don't think that stance has any effect on the MOQ.

 I'm not sure if any of my questions or reasons made sense to you, perhaps
not.  I am interested in what dmb has to say in amplification, not what
Pirsig writes.  I have not had the opportunity to discuss with RMP, but I
would probably ask him the same questions.  As such, we are left with
second-hand interpretations of MOQ.  I do find authority of any kind
threatening as you know.  I am not much one for towing the party line
without knowing why.  This is my problem.  Thanks for the post.

Mark

>
> [Arlo]
> I think more perverse is the notion that every post should reinvent the
> wheel.
> As for the MOQ *and* philosophy, DMB demonstrates a far greater depth of
> understanding and contextual knowledge than I've seen most anyone else here
> contribute. Is it this authority that threatens you?
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>