[MD] Pragmatic Fruits Indeed

[118]

Hi Andre,

I see, so what you are proposing is a psychological concept as it relates to
MOQ.  This time lag that you reference is open to debate.  Does this impinge
on MOQ, in that such debates are part of MOQ?  More simply, is the notion of
a delay essential for your view of MOQ?  I would propose that speaking would
directly be a form of Quality, and there is no time lag.  Does this fit with
how you are building MOQ?

Thanks,
Mark

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>wrote:

> Mark to Andre:
>
> I am interested in learning more about this time lag.  Recently is a post
> to John, I pointed out the research of Benjamin Libet which caused a stir in
> the 1970's...Is this what you mean?
>
> Andre:
> Yes Mark, the time lag is mentioned in ZMM and the Libet research regarding
> this in Anthony's PhD.
>
>  Mark:
> It would seem that you are making Quality much more mysterious than it
> needs to be.
>
> Andre:
> I don't mean to. Yes, I realize every six-year old knows what Quality is
> but we are talking MOQ here and not Dynamic Quality. The MOQ is a bit more
> difficult to formulate than Quality.
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>