[MD] Quality(DQ/sq)

[MarshaV]

Stranger still that you use the "demanding" when I did no such thing.


On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:44 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:

> Very strange to see that you were only yesterday, demanding the moq to be
> the bridge between the east and west,
> whilst it always was since it was stated, the moq is the bridge between the
> East and west , Marsha,Like
> Anthony pointed out.
> The moq makes no difference between an Eskimo-thinker, a scientist, or a
> bhuddist,because there is no difference,
> They are all thinkers.
> Quality is not different for darker or lighter colored people.Quality is
> quality. Nothing else.
> 
> 2010/10/13 MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> 
>> 
>> 
>> As noted above, Pirsig uses the term ‘Dynamic Quality’ (to denote the
>> continually changing flux of immediate reality) and ‘static quality’ (for
>> any pattern that appears long enough to be abstracted from this flux).
>> ‘Static quality’ refers to anything that can be conceptualised and is a
>> synonym for the conditioned in Buddhist philosophy.
>> 
>>        (McWatt,Anthony, 'MoQ Textbook)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 1:32 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Below it state that the fundemental nature of static quality is Dynamic
>> Quality:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moreover, Nagarjuna (1966, p.251) shares Pirsig’s perception that the
>> indeterminate (or Dynamic) is the fundamental nature of the conditioned (or
>> static):
>>> 
>>>    In their ultimate nature things are devoid of conditionedness
>>>    and contingency belongs to this level. This very truth is revealed
>>>    by also saying that all things ultimately enter the indeterminate
>>>    dharma or that within the heart of every conditioned entity (as its
>>>    core, as its true essence, as its very real nature) there is the
>>>    indeterminate dharma. While the one expresses the transcendence
>>>    of the ultimate reality, the other speaks of its immanence. The one
>>>    says that the ultimate reality is not an entity apart and wholly
>>>    removed from the determinate, but is the real nature of the
>>>    determinate itself.
>>> 
>>> Nagarjuna and Pirsig also have a similar recognition of two types of
>> truth; the ‘static’ conventional truth (sammuti-sacca) and the ‘Dynamic’
>> ultimate truth (paramattha-sacca).
>>> 
>>>         (Mcwatt,Anthony, 'MoQ Textbook)
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___