[MD] cloud of probability

[MarshaV]

Hello Mark,  



On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:48 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> I was trying to understand what you mean by process.  I suppose this
> could be considered static since gravitation is fixed at a particular
> time.  It is my understanding that gravity represents the attraction
> of one thing for another.  We all exude gravity.  So that is one of
> its compositions.  I would consider it a process since it acts
> accordingly.  Other part of its composition are the laws which it
> appears to follow.  Gravity also warps space depending on its
> intensity, so warping is a property.  Gravity acts on all things
> including light, so that may be another.
> 
> Can't think of any more for now.
> 
> I remember asking you what the opposite of a chair is, many years ago.
> You replied that it is a non-chair.  This still does not make much
> sense to me, but it may be moving into Ham's metaphysics of Essence.
> So that which is opposite of Gravity would be negated for a short
> while into the world of relativity (no pun intended).
> 
> I am not sure if gravity follows the same laws as quantum mechanics.
> There has yet to be a theory of everything.  So far, cosmology and
> quantum mechanics are irreconcilable.
> 
> Thanks for your answer,
> 
> Mark


Rather than negating as Ham suggests, I am suggesting 
more of a proposition of category.  If 'gravitation' is the 
pattern under consideration, I would suggest that an event 
(a thought for example) will fall into either the category 
of gravitation or non-gravittion.  


Marsha 




 
___