[MD] Posting in Dynamic Quality Format

[MarshaV]

Dear Markarulia,

You must be joking. Gender is never a non-issue: it may swing in a
positive direction or a negative direction, but it is never a non-issue.   
I write to my lover every day.  Do you think for one moment I would 
share with you?  


Yes, all in good fun.  No harm, no foul.  

Cheers,
     Marsha 
 
 


On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:37 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi All,
> It has been said that communication through writing lies within the
> realm of static quality.  Certainly it can be said that it is based on
> Subject/Object grammar.  How then do we point to dynamic quality,
> without getting stuck in these circular discussions which only point
> towards themselves?
> 
> I propose that there is a method in writing which is based on Dynamic
> Quality.  In fact there are many methods being used today with such a
> basis.  Train of thought, or automatic writing is one of those.  Often
> I have to read my posts after I have written them to see what I said.
> In this way writing is more like talking in the present tense, in the
> moment.
> 
> So, what does this look like when we are relating something that
> happened in the past?  Well, we must remember that things that
> happened in the past were happening in the present at one time.  By
> present I mean that infinitesimal (non-existent) fraction of time that
> we live in.  In order to explain this, I will use an example that has
> nothing to do with MoQ, since that is much more difficult.  I will
> choose the following sentence written in standard past-tense grammar,
> and convert it to dynamic quality format.
> 
> "The lovestruck man swam across the cold river to be with his expectant lover."
> 
> OK with that?  Now here is the Dynamic Quality Format:
> 
> "Feeling alone and despondent, the intensity of desire was building.
> Each step brought him closer to that object of his desire until he was
> met by a cold river which presented a barrier.  Yet, his wanting
> pushed him forward.  As he entered, the cold began to travel up his
> body until he was completely free of suffocating heat.  Arm over arm
> he entered into a mesmerized state where each moment was unique and
> separate from the previous.  He had no idea how long he was in this
> state, but found himself surfacing at the shore, and the spellbinding
> cold was replaced slowly with heat once more.  This much closer, he
> moved slowly towards that which he sought in order to satisfy the
> longing which had held him for so long.  This was the woman who was
> expecting him."
> 
> So, why do I call this "writing in Dynamic Quality format"?  It is
> simply because as one read this, everything is opening up to the
> reader as happening in the moment.  The subjects and objects are
> revealed as they happen.  It is not until the end of the sentence that
> the beginning is defined.  This is the way life works if we live in
> the dynamic moment.  Each moment defines those that occurred
> previously.
> 
> Give it a try and see what you guys come up with!
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___