[MD] It's a trap

[MarshaV]

Sorry, Mark, no answers for you...   
 

On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:56 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Are you sure that Dynamic Quality really IS that?  How does one know
> the unknowable?  How does one create three adjectives for the
> indivisible?  How does one define the undefinable as your "For me..."
> states?
> 
> For static patterns, is the "conditionally" an independent source?
> How does the concept of processes come into the picture, are processes
> defined before co-dependent arises?  That is, is there a third
> component which defines the process?  Is the ever-changing aspect
> unchanging?  If things are predictable, how does something
> unpredictable come into the picture (like the Black Swan)?
> 
> How does the Flow of static patterns manifest?  Is there flow and then
> Self, or is there Self and then flow?  Do the static patterns
> represent flow?  Are the static patterns dependent on flow, or is flow
> dependent on static patterns?  Are flow and static patterns dependent?
> 
> I am not getting on your case and I did ask you for your opinion,
> which I value.  I am just asking questions that I find interesting to
> further explore.  I do not have the answers.
> 
> 
> I am sorry I missed the whole Intellectual Level Brew-haha, it must
> have been interesting.  Someday I will visit the archives on that one.
> Usually when there is tension in a dialectic it is interesting to see
> how it plays out.  Sounds a bit unfinished to me, or else the
> combatants were unwilling to see what could be learned.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark


 
___